I see why Scott Bedard uses Arpie Gee as a proxy. They're both long-winded and aggressive. He thinks the board should throw out the CEO and such since elected officials acting in these positions is undemocratic. Should he get his way and the process restart, we will not have an SFUO VP Social for the fall semester.
Update: the motion passed. Also, in an unusual turn of events, Ted Horton, notorious for abstaining last year, was the only member of the SFUO executive to vote on the motion.
Well...if the SFUO wants to argue tooth-and-nail that the executive cannot "control" the elections officials, then they should not be elections officials.
ReplyDeleteThe SFUO's logic = fail.